Leon v. Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the Complaint is given the benefit of every possible favorable inference and that any documentary evidence presented must conclusively refute the Plaintiff's claims
• noting that New York law does not require any particular phraseology to effect an assignment, “it is only required that there be a perfected transaction between the assignor and assignee, intended by those parties to vest in the assignee a present right in the things assigned”
• Finding in the context of a motion to dismiss that a third party might be “entitled” to funds where the “client has conveyed a right to [the] funds by an enforceable assignment”
• “An assignment may properly relate to a future or conditional right which is adequately identified”
• \An assignment may properly relate to a future ... right which is adequately identified....\
• dismissal denied since copies of checks and bank statements did not conclusively refute loan default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).