Skip to main content
· 10/6/2011

Emerson v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark

Citations

  • 263 P.3d 224
  • 127 Nev. 672
  • 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 61
  • 2011 Nev. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an award of attorney fees as sanctions is appropriate where the amount of the award is proportionate to the misconduct
  • determining that an attorney did not have a remedy at law and writ consideration was appropriate because he was sanctioned in the course of a case where he was not a party
  • determining that an attorney did not have a remedy at law and writ consi.deration was appropriate because he was sanctioned in the course of a case where he was not a party
  • \The sanction . . . must be visited upon the offender. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saitta, Hardesty, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.