Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Rotches Pork Packers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that facts contained in a bankruptcy court order were an improper subject for judicial notice
• holding that facts contained in a bankruptcy court order were an improper subject for judicial notice
• holding that unsubstantiated opinion, which would be precluded at trial by Fed.R.Evid. 701, is subject to strike pursuant to Rule 56(e)’s personal knowledge requirement, as well as the admissibility and competency requirements
• noting that the court may take judicial notice of a document filed in another court to establish the fact that such litigation occurred
• stating that court cannot take judicial notice of a document for the truth of the matters asserted in the other litigation
• holding that a court may take judicial notice of a court order “not for the truth of the matters asserted in the other litigation, but rather to establish the fact of such litigation and filings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).