Hill v. Motor Vehicle Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• information provided in the DR-15 form was sufficient to safeguard the detainee's right to due process
• An administrative law judge modified a suspension of a commercial driver’s license so that the driver could drive non-commercial motor vehicles while participating in the Ignition Interlock System Program.
• An administrative law judge modified a suspension of a commercial driver’s license so that the driver could drive non-commercial motor vehicles while participating in the Ignition Interlock System Program.
• “[A]ny consideration of whether Hill’s due process rights were violated will hinge solely on an analysis of whether the [Advice of Rights] form… correctly advised Hill of the proper sanctions applicable under the statute without being misleading.”
• “[A]ny consideration of whether Hill’s due process rights were violated will hinge solely on an analysis of whether the [Advice of Rights] form ... correctly advised Hill of the proper sanctions applicable under the statute without being misleading.”
• “[T]he continued possession of a driver’s license may become essential to earning a livelihood; it is, therefore, an entitlement that may not be taken away without the due process mandated by the Fourteenth Amendment.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).