Wyoming Supreme Court· 9/2/2004

Giles v. State

Citations

2004 WY 101
96 P.3d 1027
2004 WL 1944788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Prejudice will be determined to exist only where an appellant demonstrates that the instruction given confused or misled the jury with respect to the proper principles of law.”
“Prejudice will be determined to exist only where an appellant demonstrates that the instruction given confused or misled the jury with respect to the proper principles of law.”
“Prejudice will be determined to exist only where an appellant demonstrates that the instruction given confused or misled the jury with respect to the proper principles of law.”
“Prejudice will be determined to exist only where an appellant demonstrates that the instruction given confused or misled the jury with respect to the proper principles of law.”
“Jury instructions are written with the particular facts and theories of each case in mind.” (quoting Pierson v. State, 956 P.2d 1119, 1126 (Wyo. 1998), holding modified by Rabuck v. State, 2006 WY 25, 129 P.3d 861 (Wyo. 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Golden, Lehman, Kite, Voigt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.