· 2/5/1987
Scadden v. State
Citations
- 732 P.2d 1036
- 1987 Wyo. LEXIS 393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- compelling state interest in preventing conflicts of interest in public employment
- a person of ordinary sensibilities when occupying a position of authority clearly should have known that his conduct was forbidden
- where testimony is relevant to proving an element of the crime, its probative character justifies its introduction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Brown, Cardine, Urbigkit, MacY
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.