Skip to main content
· 2/5/1987

Scadden v. State

Citations

  • 732 P.2d 1036
  • 1987 Wyo. LEXIS 393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • compelling state interest in preventing conflicts of interest in public employment
  • a person of ordinary sensibilities when occupying a position of authority clearly should have known that his conduct was forbidden
  • where testimony is relevant to proving an element of the crime, its probative character justifies its introduction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Brown, Cardine, Urbigkit, MacY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.