Sanderson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for plain error the argument that testimony constituted impermissible character evidence under W.R.E. 404(a); although the defendant objected to the testimony below he did not do so on Rule 404(a) grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).