Seventh Circuit· 7/15/2009
Gicla v. United States
Citations
- 572 F.3d 407
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15702
- 2009 WL 2031295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the factfinder must determine what weight and credibility to give the testimony of each expert and physician
- noting that a “battle of the experts” requires “the factfinder to determine what weight and credibility to give the testimony of each expert and physician”
- noting that a “battle of the experts” requires “the factfinder to determine what weight and credibility to give the testimony of each expert and physician”
- observing that the case “pre‐ sented a classic battle of the experts … [that] called upon the factfinder to determine what weight and credibility to give to each expert”
- noting the case involved “a classic battle of the experts . . . [that] called upon the factfinder to determine what weight and credibility to give to each expert”
- finding no prejudice where expert’s “eleventh-hour review” of Page 9 of 12 evidence did not alter his already-disclosed opinions and other party was given recess at a bench trial to confer and then cross examine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Morisch v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2011-07-29· cited 95×
- Meyers v. National RR Passenger Corp.(Amtrak)Seventh Circuit· 2010-08-30· cited 83×
- Baugh ex rel. Baugh v. Cuprum S.A. de C.V.Seventh Circuit· 2017-01-11· cited 35×
- Coleman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceN.D. Indiana· 2011-06-02· cited 14×
- Madden v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsSeventh Circuit· 2017-10-17· cited 11×
- Ford-Sholebo v. United StatesN.D. Illinois· 2013-09-03· cited 9×
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-04-30· cited 7×
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation DistrictN.D. Illinois· 2016-04-20· cited 4×
- PNC Bank, National Association v. Samuel G. BoytorSeventh Circuit· 2024-07-16· cited 4×
- Russell v. BukowskiSeventh Circuit· 2015-07-24· cited 3×
- John Baugh v. Cuprum S.A. de C.V.Seventh Circuit· 2017-01-11
- United States v. Richard WitkemperSeventh Circuit· 2022-02-28
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Streber v. HunterFifth Circuit· 2000-08-04· cited 171×
- Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York v. Intercounty National Title Insurance CompanySeventh Circuit· 2005-06-17· cited 123×
- United States v. Thomas Edward UzenskiFourth Circuit· 2006-01-13· cited 106×
- Crowe v. MarchandFirst Circuit· 2007-10-19· cited 102×
- United States v. LongstreetSeventh Circuit· 2009-06-08· cited 80×
- Dennis L. SORIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OZINGA BROS., INC., Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1983-04-07· cited 58×
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Blue Sky Medical Group, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-02-02· cited 57×
- United States v. OlofsonSeventh Circuit· 2009-05-01· cited 38×
- William KIDD III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE, Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1999-01-12· cited 28×
- Salgado ex rel. Salgado v. General Motors Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.