United States v. Olofson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the Staples footnote “was providing a glossary for terms frequently appearing in the opinion” and not “interpreting a statute”
• “Whether jury instructions correctly state the law is a matter we review de novo.”
• defining the term \automatically\ in the NFA's definition of \machinegun\
• defining the term “automatically” in the NFA’s definition of “machinegun”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).