Crowe v. Marchand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding physician could rely on reports of x-ray and MRI ″instead of reading the films himself″
• describing Rule 702 as “[t]he touchstone for the admission of expert testimony”
• “Rule 703 was enacted in part ‘to bring the judicial practice into line with the practice of the experts themselves when not in court.’ ”
• “Rule 703 was enacted in part ‘to bring the judicial practice into line with the practice of the experts themselves when not in court.’ ”
• “[A] pattern, if sufficiently persistent or widespread as to acquire the force of law, may constitute a policy or custom within the meaning of Monell.”
• “Objections of this type, CIVIL NO. 18-1532 (JAG) 6 which question the factual underpinnings of an expert’s investigation, often go to the weight of the proffered testimony, not to its admissibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).