United States v. Thomas Edward Uzenski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction where evidence established “at the very least, that the device was capable of exploding”
• “It is the ‘compulsive aspect of custodial interrogation, and not the strength or content of the government's suspicions at the time the questioning was conducted’ that implicates Miranda.” (quoting Beckwith v. United States, 425 U.S. 341, 346 (1976))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).