Howard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that convictions for trafficking by possession and simple possession of the same drugs violated double jeopardy
• holding that the appellant could not be convicted and sentenced for possession of methamphetamine and trafficking and noting that “[w]here, as here, the trafficking, offense is based on possession, the conduct element is the same for both trafficking and possession”
• holding double jeopardy principles prohibited punishing appellant for possession of methamphetamine and trafficking where “the trafficking offense [was] based on possession,” and thus “the conduct element is the same for both [offenses]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Melton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-09-16· cited 5×
• Charneco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-30· cited 3×
• Aubuchon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-08· cited 2×
• McAdory v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-21· cited 1×
• Thomas M. Palmer v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-03· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gibbs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-08-21· cited 49×
• Sims v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-12· cited 8×