· 2/28/1990
McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. Quarles
Citations
- 894 F.2d 1482
- 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1222
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2689
- 1990 WL 11019
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that objections to document requests on the ground that they were “overly broad, burdensome, oppressive, and irrelevant” were insufficient
- finding party resisting discovery must show why each discovery request is not relevant or otherwise objectionable
- finding party resisting discovery must show why each discovery request is not relevant or otherwise objectionable
- finding party resisting discovery must show why each discovery request is not relevant or otherwise objectionable
- upholding an award of attorneys’ fees granted as part of a default judgment
- upholding an award of attorneys’ fees granted as part of a default judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gee, Jones, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.