Skip to main content
· 2/28/1990

McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. Quarles

Citations

  • 894 F.2d 1482
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1222
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2689
  • 1990 WL 11019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that objections to document requests on the ground that they were “overly broad, burdensome, oppressive, and irrelevant” were insufficient
  • finding party resisting discovery must show why each discovery request is not relevant or otherwise objectionable
  • finding party resisting discovery must show why each discovery request is not relevant or otherwise objectionable
  • finding party resisting discovery must show why each discovery request is not relevant or otherwise objectionable
  • upholding an award of attorneys’ fees granted as part of a default judgment
  • upholding an award of attorneys’ fees granted as part of a default judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gee, Jones, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.