District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/2/2005
Gelsthorpe v. Weinstein
Citations
- 897 So. 2d 504
- 2005 WL 473915
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- superseded by statute as stated in Perez v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc., 138 So. 3d 492, 497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014) (statute changed Florida “from a Frye jurisdiction to a Daubert jurisdiction”)
- \[M]edical expert testimony concerning the causation of a medical condition will be considered pure opinion testimony and thus not subject to Frye analysis when it is based solely on the expert's training and experience.\
- superseded by statute as stated in Perez v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc., 138 So. 3d 492, 497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014) (statute changed Florida “from a Frye jurisdiction to a Daubert jurisdiction”)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canady
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marsh v. ValyouSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 49×
- William Booker v. Sumter County Sheriff's Office/North American etcDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-28· cited 26×
- People v. SchuitAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-12-07· cited 24×
- Perez v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-23· cited 24×
- Cordoba v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 12×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ThorneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-08· cited 10×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-27· cited 4×
- Herlihy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-24· cited 2×
- Hood v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-15
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-11-21· cited 436×
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-07-31· cited 283×
- Brim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-01-16· cited 113×
- Hadden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-06· cited 113×
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-09· cited 95×
- Castillo v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-10· cited 42×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-20· cited 33×
- US Sugar Corp. v. HensonSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-06-06· cited 31×
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. TursiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-31· cited 15×
- Holy Cross Hosp., Inc. v. MarroneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-17· cited 11×
- Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. SoderstromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-21· cited 6×
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-12· cited 6×
- Cerna v. South Fla. Bioavailability Clinic, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.