Gelsthorpe v. Weinstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• superseded by statute as stated in Perez v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc., 138 So. 3d 492, 497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014) (statute changed Florida “from a Frye jurisdiction to a Daubert jurisdiction”)
• \[M]edical expert testimony concerning the causation of a medical condition will be considered pure opinion testimony — and thus not subject to Frye analysis — when it is based solely on the expert's training and experience.\
• superseded by statute as stated in Perez v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc., 138 So. 3d 492, 497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014) (statute changed Florida “from a Frye jurisdiction to a Daubert jurisdiction”)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).