District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/31/1999
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Tursi
Citations
- 729 So. 2d 995
- 1999 WL 174207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding Frye inapplicable where the physician was qualified to testify about the cause of a cataract based on his knowledge and experience
- ophthalmologist's opinion on causation not required to meet Frye standard because opinion was not based on novel scientific evidence, but rather expert's experience and training
- ophthalmologist's opinion on causation not required to meet Frye standard because opinion was not based on novel scientific evidence, but rather expert's experience and training
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Westerheide v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-29· cited 54×
- Marsh v. ValyouSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 49×
- Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-15· cited 49×
- William Booker v. Sumter County Sheriff's Office/North American etcDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-28· cited 26×
- Perez v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-23· cited 24×
- US Sugar Corp. v. HensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-20· cited 15×
- Kuxhausen v. Tillman Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-12-12· cited 12×
- Gelsthorpe v. WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-02· cited 11×
- Holy Cross Hosp., Inc. v. MarroneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-17· cited 11×
- Davis v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-02· cited 8×
- Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. SoderstromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-21· cited 6×
- Marsh v. ValyouDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-23· cited 4×
- State v. SerceyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-17· cited 4×
- Cerna v. South Fla. Bioavailability Clinic, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-30· cited 3×
- Botta v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-07-27· cited 3×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1991-08-15· cited 146×
- Hadden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-06· cited 113×
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-09· cited 95×
- Nash v. Wells Fargo Guard Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-03· cited 73×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 72×
- Flanagan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-14· cited 38×
- Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-03· cited 32×
- Centex-Rooney Const. Co., Inc. v. Martin CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-31· cited 32×
- Loureiro v. Pools by Greg, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-30· cited 10×
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. VieraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-21· cited 7×
- Shufflebarger v. GallowayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-14· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.