People v. Schuit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that racketeering conspiracy requires proof of, inter alia, “two or more predicate acts of racketeering”
• first quoting N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102; and then citing 11 N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. § 65-3.11
• “To prove the pattern element, the government must show that two or more predicate acts were, or were intended to be, committed as part of the conspiracy.”
• conspiracy to commit wire fraud and to commit money laundering require proof of a defendant’s “knowing engagement in the conspiracy with the specific intent that the object of the conspiracy be committed.”
• a court “cannot consider the cumulative effect of non-errors”
• inferring causation based on the timing of events

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).