Fourth Circuit· 5/8/1985
Gay v. Wall
Citations
- 761 F.2d 175
- 2 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 53
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the non-moving party has the right to file counter affidavits or pursue reasonable discovery
- explaining that the notice requirement for converting a motion to dismiss is satisfied “[w]hen a party is aware that material outside the pleadings is before the court”
- explaining that the notice requirement for converting a motion to dismiss is satisfied “[w]hen a party is aware that material outside the pleadings is before the court”
- plaintiff stated claim when he al- leged that defendants continued to hold him despite “actual knowledge” that he was the wrong person
- “The defendants’ motion was simply a motion to dismiss, not a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, a motion for summary judgment.”
- “Because Gay was not afforded an opportunity for reasonable discovery, the district court’s treatment of the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment was an abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2011-03-11· cited 2,110×
- Floyd Sanders, III v. Don English, Curtis McCoy Ed Perry, and the City of MansfieldFifth Circuit· 1992-01-21· cited 180×
- Mays v. SudderthFifth Circuit· 1996-10-16· cited 125×
- Fare Deals Ltd. v. World Choice Travel. Com, Inc.D. Maryland· 2001-11-20· cited 85×
- Jeffers v. ThompsonD. Maryland· 2003-05-08· cited 54×
- Shooting Point, L.L.C. v. CummingE.D. Virginia· 2002-12-20· cited 31×
- Brown v. Neuberger, Quinn, Gielen, Rubin & Gibber, P.A.D. Maryland· 2010-08-02· cited 31×
- Vance v. Nunnery,et alFifth Circuit· 1998-03-16· cited 22×
- Paulone v. City of FrederickD. Maryland· 2010-02-17· cited 22×
- Insteel Industries, Inc. v. Costanza Contracting Co.E.D. Virginia· 2003-07-31· cited 19×
- Kuechler v. Peoples BankD. Maryland· 2009-03-09· cited 17×
- Brady v. DillD. Massachusetts· 1998-10-16· cited 11×
- Mezu v. Morgan State UniversityD. Maryland· 2003-03-31· cited 8×
- Maersk Line Ltd. v. CareE.D. Virginia· 2003-07-08· cited 8×
- Rupert v. GerenD. Maryland· 2009-03-31· cited 7×
- Jordan v. Washington Mutual BankD. Maryland· 2002-07-30· cited 5×
- Finley Lines Joint Protective Board Unit 200, Brotherhood Railway Carmen, a Division of Transportation Communications Union v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1997-04-03· cited 3×
- Eli Martinez v. Minerva SantiagoSeventh Circuit· 2022-10-17· cited 3×
- Time Warner Cable Information Services (North Carolina), LLC v. DuncanE.D. North Carolina· 2009-09-23· cited 1×
- Heretick v. Amberley Shipping Corp.E.D. Virginia· 2002-10-17· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court· 1975-04-14· cited 2,195×
- Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court· 1978-02-22· cited 925×
- Gay v. WallFourth Circuit· 1985-05-08· cited 328×
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanySixth Circuit· 1975-10-06· cited 310×
- Portland Retail Druggists Association, Etc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanNinth Circuit· 1981-11-30· cited 112×
- Dale v. HahnSecond Circuit· 1971-02-19· cited 78×
- Harvey B. Johnson v. Rac CorporationFourth Circuit· 1974-02-05· cited 58×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.