Portland Retail Druggists Association, Etc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]hen the district court looks outside the pleadings in evaluating a noticed Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the motion must be converted and treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56.”
• under Royal Drug, \spreading of risk\ is \essential for application of the McCarran-Ferguson defense\
• under Royal Drug, “spreading of risk” is “essential for application of the McCarran-Ferguson defense”
• “Implicit in the ‘opportunity to respond’ is the requirement that sufficient time be afforded for discovery necessary to develop ‘facts essential to justify [a party’s] motion.’”
• “Implicit in the opportunity to respond is the requirement that sufficient time be afforded for 15 discovery necessary to develop facts essential to justify a party's opposition to the motion 16 [for summary judgment].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).