Skip to main content
· 5/8/1985

Gay v. Wall

Citations

  • 761 F.2d 175
  • 2 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 53
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the non-moving party has the right to file counter affidavits or pursue reasonable discovery
  • explaining that the notice requirement for converting a motion to dismiss is satisfied “[w]hen a party is aware that material outside the pleadings is before the court”
  • explaining that the notice requirement for converting a motion to dismiss is satisfied “[w]hen a party is aware that material outside the pleadings is before the court”
  • plaintiff stated claim when he al- leged that defendants continued to hold him despite “actual knowledge” that he was the wrong person
  • “The defendants’ motion was simply a motion to dismiss, not a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, a motion for summary judgment.”
  • “Because Gay was not afforded an opportunity for reasonable discovery, the district court’s treatment of the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment was an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.