Fourth Circuit· 1/11/2012
Denis Zelaya v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Citations
- 668 F.3d 159
- 2012 WL 76059
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 555
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that particular social group of young Honduran males who refuse to join the gang not cognizable
- holding that resisting gang recruitment does not satisfy the requirements for a protectable social group
- recognizing that the petitioner’s proposed social group of young Honduran males who refuse to join MS-13 did not have the immutable characteristic of family bonds and denying petition for review with respect to asylum and withholding of removal claims
- holding “young Honduran males who refuse to join MS-13, have notified authorities of MS-13’s harassment tactics and have an identifiable MS-13 tormenter” lacked particularity
- noting that resisting gang recruitment is \an amorphous characteristic providing neither an adequate benchmark for determining group membership nor embodying a concrete trait that would readily identify a person as possessing such a characteristic\
- vacating denial of CAT claim where agency failed to consider evidence of collaboration between local police and gang
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Floyd, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- M-E-V-GBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2014-07-01· cited 1,009×
- W-G-RBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2014-07-01· cited 359×
- Elias Umana-Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 2013-07-30· cited 131×
- Julio Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2014-01-23· cited 112×
- Wildon Cordova v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2014-07-18· cited 81×
- Hernan Portillo-Flores v. Merrick GarlandFourth Circuit· 2021-06-29· cited 66×
- Eduardo Rodriguez-Arias v. Matthew WhitakerFourth Circuit· 2019-02-12· cited 62×
- Jose Cortez-Mendez v. Matthew WhitakerFourth Circuit· 2019-01-07· cited 51×
- Sindy Alvarez Lagos v. William BarrFourth Circuit· 2019-06-14· cited 50×
- Gurpreet Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2012-11-05· cited 41×
- Tumaini Temu v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2014-01-16· cited 41×
- Rosa Cabrera Vasquez v. William BarrFourth Circuit· 2019-03-20· cited 28×
- Juan Amaya v. Jeffrey RosenFourth Circuit· 2021-01-25· cited 27×
- Walter Herrera-Martinez v. Merrick GarlandFourth Circuit· 2022-01-05· cited 20×
- Noel Canales-Rivera v. William BarrFourth Circuit· 2020-01-27· cited 17×
- Maria Amaya-De Sicaran v. William BarrFourth Circuit· 2020-10-30· cited 17×
- Christian Santos Garcia v. Merrick GarlandFourth Circuit· 2023-07-11· cited 12×
- Carlos Manuel Calles Quinteros v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 2013-03-01· cited 11×
- Zuowei Chen v. Merrick GarlandFourth Circuit· 2023-07-06· cited 3×
- Hernan Flores v. William BarrFourth Circuit· 2020-09-02· cited 1×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 3,975×
- Djenaba Camara v. John Ashcroft, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United StatesFourth Circuit· 2004-08-06· cited 497×
- MOGARRABIBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1987-07-01· cited 442×
- S-E-GBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2008-07-01· cited 271×
- Ramos-Lopez v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2009-04-16· cited 177×
- Gomis v. HolderFourth Circuit· 2009-07-06· cited 162×
- Crespin-Valladares v. HolderFourth Circuit· 2011-02-16· cited 145×
- Lizama v. HolderFourth Circuit· 2011-01-19· cited 102×
- Tassi v. HolderFourth Circuit· 2011-11-07· cited 88×
- Gatimi v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-20· cited 80×
- Scatambuli v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-02-25· cited 66×
- Nken v. HolderFourth Circuit· 2009-10-30· cited 41×
- JIAN TAO LIN v. HolderFourth Circuit· 2010-07-12· cited 27×
- Yi Ni v. HolderFourth Circuit· 2010-07-13· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.