Skip to main content

Lykins v. State

Citations

  • 415 A.2d 1113
  • 288 Md. 71
  • 1980 Md. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that “separation of powers ‘compels that we brook no lightly assumed interference by the judicial branch with the function of [the State’s Attorney] . . . and . . . not arrogate unto our branch supervisory powers which the Constitution does not bestow’”
  • providing that “separation of powers ‘compels that we brook no lightly assumed interference by the judicial branch with the function of [the State’s Attorney] . . . and . . . not arrogate unto our branch supervisory powers which the Constitution does not bestow’”
  • proper remedy when prosecutor possesses confidential information concerning defendant is to bar prosecutor’s participation in new trial, not dismissal
  • state’s attorney disqualified from prosecuting defendant whom he had formerly represented in divorce action
  • when prosecutor previously had represented defendant but record showed no actual conflict of interest or improper motive for bringing prosecution, proper remedy was to disqualify prosecutor, not to dismiss charges
  • State's Attorney's former representation of defendant merited replacement of prosecutor, not dismissal of indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson and Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.