Skip to main content

Patterson v. State

Citations

  • 299 Ga. 491
  • 789 S.E.2d 175
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State need not prove the defendant driver acted with a specific intent to place the victim in such apprehension when “evidence of [the defendant’s] intent to drive the vehicle as he did [was] undisputed”
  • concluding that the crime of 6 simple assault under OCGA § 16-5-20 (a) (2) was not a specific intent crime because the statute did not contain any requirement that the defendant act with the specific intent to place the victim in reasonable apprehension of receiving a violent injury
  • holding that the crime of simple assault as set forth in OCGA § 16-5-20 (a) (2) does not include plain language requiring proof of a specific intent, and noting that it was a matter for the General Assembly to phrase a statute to include such a specific intent requirement
  • the crime of “assault” does not require proof of intent “to place the victim in reasonable apprehension of receiving a violent injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines, Melton, Nahmias, Blackwell, Nah-Mias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.