Skip to main content
· 3/3/2008

Wilhelm v. Credico, Inc.

Citations

  • 519 F.3d 416
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4479
  • 2008 WL 553207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the court \ha[d] no difficulty concluding\ the FDCPA violation \was caused by a bona fide error\ without analyzing the element of causation
  • upholding bona fide error defense when debt collector trained employees to segregate principal and interest to avoid interest-on-interest errors
  • upholding entitlement to bona fide error defense where debt collector mistakenly added interest on past-due interest because it trained and instructed employees to segregate unpaid principal from past-due interest to prevent FDCPA violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Gruender, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.