Skip to main content
· 8/27/1997

Federal Case

Citations

  • 122 F.3d 480
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a collection notice that uses the exact statutory language will not be considered false, misleading, or deceptive
  • holding that a collection notice that uses the exact statutory language will not be considered false, misleading, or deceptive
  • debt collector gave up all attempts to contact debtor and actually returned debtor’s file to original creditor
  • applying the “unsophisticated consumer” standard to § 1692e claim
  • affirming dismissal under Rule 12

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.