Skip to main content
· 3/17/2009

Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

Citations

  • 605 F. Supp. 2d 914
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21289
  • 2009 WL 692193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that filing of foreclosure action while knowing that one lacks ability to prove ownership of debt is actionable under the FDCPA
  • explaining that one of the four required elements of a prima facia case for a violation of the FDCPA is that the defendant collecting the debt is a \debt collector\ within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6
  • setting forth the four elements to establish a prima facie case for a FDCPA violation
  • to state a claim under the FDCPA, plaintiff must allege that the debt was created primarily for personal, family or household purposes
  • “The absence of any factor[, including that defendant is a debt collector under § 1692a(6),] is fatal to plaintiffs claims under § 1692[g]”
  • “In ruling on a motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Court may . . . consider documents attached to, incorporated by, or referred to in the pleadings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd, Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.