Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 4/8/1993

Garvey v. Vaughn

Citations

  • 993 F.2d 776
  • 1993 WL 81731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Supreme Court decision at issue had not “create[d] an exception for a pro se inmate to evade time requirements.”
  • holding that for pro se prisoners, “the date of filing shall be that of delivery to prison officials of a complaint or other papers destined for district court for the purpose of ascertaining timeliness”
  • holding that for pro se prisoners, “the date of filing shall be that of delivery to prison officials of a complaint or other papers destined for district court for the purpose of ascertaining timeliness” (emphasis in original)
  • deciding the application of the prison-mailbox rule to plaintiff’s FTCA complaint and declining to address supplemental issues that “are not purely questions of law”
  • observing that under the “mailbox rule” a court will generally deem a prisoner document filed on the date the plaintiff delivers it to prison officials for mailing
  • stating that “the date of filing shall be that of delivery to prison officials of a complaint or other papers destined for district court for the purpose of ascertaining timeliness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Johnson, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Garvey v. Vaughn

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.