Skip to main content
· 6/20/1988

Daniel Loconte v. Richard Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth

Citations

  • 847 F.2d 745
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8524
  • 1988 WL 54668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding coercion by co-defendants and family members did not invalidate plea
  • stating the district court’s obligation to conduct a de novo review of the record arises whenever there is a “timely and specific objection”
  • “[F]or his own reasons — to save himself from a possible death sentence and to secure the release of his wife,” the defendant pled guilty.
  • \It is only where the plea is coerced by conduct fairly attributable to the state that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is offended.\
  • “It is only where the plea is coerced by conduct fairly attributable to the state that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is offended.”
  • guilty plea not involuntary where co-defendant urged defendant to enter plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roney, Anderson, Allgood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.