· 6/20/1988
Daniel Loconte v. Richard Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth
Citations
- 847 F.2d 745
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8524
- 1988 WL 54668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding coercion by co-defendants and family members did not invalidate plea
- stating the district court’s obligation to conduct a de novo review of the record arises whenever there is a “timely and specific objection”
- “[F]or his own reasons — to save himself from a possible death sentence and to secure the release of his wife,” the defendant pled guilty.
- \It is only where the plea is coerced by conduct fairly attributable to the state that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is offended.\
- “It is only where the plea is coerced by conduct fairly attributable to the state that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is offended.”
- guilty plea not involuntary where co-defendant urged defendant to enter plea
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roney, Anderson, Allgood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.