Skip to main content
· 7/10/1998

Taylor v. McKune

Citations

  • 962 P.2d 566
  • 25 Kan. App. 2d 283
  • 1998 Kan. App. LEXIS 73

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the date an inmate places his or her petition in the prison mail constitutes the date of filing within the meaning of 60-1501[b]
  • adopting Houston for purposes of inmate filings for state habeas pursuant to Kansas Statutes Annotated § 60-1501
  • “We have noted Taylor’s petition was initially filed with no verification .... [Njone of the deficiencies or omissions deprive the district court of jurisdiction.”
  • petition's omissions—no verification, no list of prior civil actions, no filing fee, and no poverty affidavit—were corrected after district court issued order of noncompliance
  • applying the federal prison mailbox rule to K.S.A. 60-1501 petitions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brazil, Lewis, Knudson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.