· 7/10/1998
Taylor v. McKune
Citations
- 962 P.2d 566
- 25 Kan. App. 2d 283
- 1998 Kan. App. LEXIS 73
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the date an inmate places his or her petition in the prison mail constitutes the date of filing within the meaning of 60-1501[b]
- adopting Houston for purposes of inmate filings for state habeas pursuant to Kansas Statutes Annotated § 60-1501
- “We have noted Taylor’s petition was initially filed with no verification .... [Njone of the deficiencies or omissions deprive the district court of jurisdiction.”
- petition's omissions—no verification, no list of prior civil actions, no filing fee, and no poverty affidavit—were corrected after district court issued order of noncompliance
- applying the federal prison mailbox rule to K.S.A. 60-1501 petitions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brazil, Lewis, Knudson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.