Skip to main content
· 4/22/1996

Garry v. Geils

Citations

  • 82 F.3d 1362
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 9246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The plaintiffs contend that while their request for injunctive relief may have been 8 barred by Rooker–Feldman, their damages claim was not. They provide no legal authority for this 9 argument. We have previously applied Rooker–Feldman to damages claims in similar cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.