Judy Kratville v. Marvin T. Runyon, United States Postmaster General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a dismissal based on statute of limitations Or administrative deadline constitutes a decision on the merits for purposes of claim preclusion
• noting that a dismissal based on statute of lim‐ itations or administrative deadline constitutes a decision on the merits for purposes of claim preclusion
• “Because the deadlines for filing administrative complaints operate as statutes of limita- tions, the doctrines of equitable tolling and estoppel ap- ply.”
• “A decision by a federal court that a statute of limitations . . . bars an action is a decision on the merits for purposes of claim preclusion.”
• “A decision by a federal court that a statute of limitations or an administrative deadline bars an action is a decision on the merits for purposes of claim preclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).