Skip to main content
· 4/17/2003

Federal Case

Citations

  • 326 F.3d 816
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[G]iven principles of comity, we cannot lightly assume that a state court would disregard federal law.”
  • “Instead of an injunction by the federal district court, the aggrieved party’s recourse is by appeal through the state court system and, ultimately, to the Supreme Court.”
  • court “must still determine whether an injunction is an appropriate exercise of its authority”
  • “The extraordinary relief of an injunction of state court proceedings must also be supported by the traditional equitable requirements such as irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law.”
  • reversing grant of injunction where proceedings insufficiently advanced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.