D.C. Circuit· 5/31/2018
Garnett v. Zeilinger
Citations
- 313 F. Supp. 3d 147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he requirement for absolute compliance with the timelines for processing applications flows directly from the statutory text itself. This text ‘literally requires strict compliance with its provisions.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Garnett v. ZeilingerD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-23· cited 9×
- District of Columbia v. U.S. Department of AgricultureDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-13
- O.M.G. v. WolfDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-22
- National Federation of the Blind v. SaulDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-22
- Garnett v. ZeilingerDistrict of Columbia· 2020-09-09
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 1,831×
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandD.C. Circuit· 2006-07-07· cited 634×
- Sherley v. SebeliusD.C. Circuit· 2011-04-29· cited 481×
- Richard Dorfmann, T/a Tenth Street Limited Partnership v. Russell B. BoozerTenth Circuit· 1969-06-16· cited 137×
- Kildare v. SaenzNinth Circuit· 2003-03-24· cited 114×
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-23· cited 84×
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States NavyD.C. Circuit· 2012-11-02· cited 70×
- Larry Klayman v. Barack ObamaD.C. Circuit· 2015-08-28· cited 66×
- Francis N. Haskins, Daniel E. Noble, and Irma Rodriquez, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Wayne A. StantonSeventh Circuit· 1986-07-09· cited 42×
- Edward Withrow Janelle Roberts v. Kevin Concannon Freddye Webb-PetettNinth Circuit· 1991-08-19· cited 36×
- Briggs v. BrembySecond Circuit· 2015-07-06· cited 30×
- Shands v. TullThird Circuit· 1979-07-24· cited 29×
- Fund for Animals, Inc. v. EspyDistrict of Columbia· 1993-02-24· cited 23×
- ALLINA HEALTH SERVICES v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2010-12-22· cited 21×
- Garnett v. ZeilingerD.C. Circuit· 2018-03-28· cited 17×
- Alexander v. HillFourth Circuit· 1983-05-05· cited 17×
- Robertson v. JacksonE.D. Virginia· 1991-06-05· cited 16×
- Robidoux v. KitchelD. Vermont· 1995-02-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.