· 6/16/1969
Richard Dorfmann, T/a Tenth Street Limited Partnership v. Russell B. Boozer
Citations
- 414 F.2d 1168
- 13 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 656
- 134 U.S. App. D.C. 272
- 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11940
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The power to issue a preliminary injunction, especially a mandatory one, should be sparingly exercised.”
- “The power to issue a preliminary injunction, especially a mandatory one, should be sparingly exercised.” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “The power to issue a preliminary injunction, especially a mandatory one, should be ‘sparingly exercised.’” (quoting 7 J.W. Moore, Federal Practice P65.04(1), p. 1627 (2d ed. 1968))
- “The power to issue a preliminary injunction, especially a mandatory one, should be ‘sparingly exercised.’” (quoting 7 J.W. MOORE, FEDERAL PRACTICE ¶ 65.04(1), at 1627 (2d ed. 1968))
- “The power to issue a preliminary injunction, especially a mandatory one, should be ‘sparingly exercised.’” (quoting 7 J.W. MOORE, FEDERAL PRACTICE ¶ 65.04(1), at 1627 (2d ed. 1968))
- “The preliminary injunction, especially one which worked a transfer of money belonging to persons who were not within the jurisdiction of the court, should not have been issued before the action was certified as a class action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weight, McGowan, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.