Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Espy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a NEPA violation where “the record reveals no contemporaneous consideration by the administrative decisionmaker of the applicability of the categorical exclusion”
• “a public interest expressed by Congress was frustrated by approval of this proposal, with likely environmental consequences, without NEPA compliance.”
• preliminarily enjoining a federal program which would have hunted 10 to 60 bison from a herd, as such an injury was permanent and not compensable in money damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).