Skip to main content
· 10/26/2009

Gardner v. Grandolsky

Citations

  • 585 F.3d 786
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23471
  • 2009 WL 3416153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that jurisdiction existed to address petitioner’s claim that BOP regulation, which categorically excluded felons whose offense involved possession of a firearm from eligibility for a sentence reduction under the RDAP, violated the APA
  • deciding an APA claim against a BOP regulation within a habeas petition
  • declining to consider an argument raised for the first time on appeal that was not raised in a habeas petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Jordan, Van Antwerpen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.