Gatewood v. Outlaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 28 C.F.R. § 550.58 is not arbitrary and capricious, but reasonably based on the BOP’s public safety concerns
• noting that there “is simply no reason to suspect that public safety was not the actual basis” for the regulation given the BOP’s “primary public safety mission”
• noting that it is sometimes appropriate to discern the reasons for a final rule from prior statements reflecting a consistent policy
• noting that it is sometimes appropriate to discern the reasons for a final rule from prior statements reflecting a consistent policy
• noting that there “is simply no reason to suspect that public safety was not the actual basis” for the regulation given the BOP’s “primary public safety mission”
• noting that there “is simply no reason to suspect that public safety was not the actual basis” for the regulation given the BOP’s “primary public safety mission”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).