Arrington v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, in discussing the BOP’s public safety rationale, the Supreme Court cited the appellate brief and not any contemporaneous administrative source
• rejecting rationale recited by the district court that was “entirely absent from the administrative record”
• concluding a categorical rule promulgated by the Bureau of Prisons violated the APA because one offered rationale was absent from the agency record and the agency did not explain in the record how the second rationale supported the rule
• concluding a categorical rule promulgated by the Bureau of Prisons violated the APA because one offered rationale was absent from the agency record and the agency did not explain in the record how the second rationale supported the rule
• rejecting rationale recited by the district court that was “entirely absent from the admin- istrative record”
• rejecting a justification for agency action that “is entirely absent from the administrative record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).