Licon v. Ledezma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the BOP’s policy is not arbitrary, and therefore the BOP acted within its discretion by excluding inmates convicted of felon-in-possession charges
• “We will ‘uphold a decision of less 37 than ideal clarity if the agency’s path may be reasonably discerned.’” (quoting Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 658 (2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).