Skip to main content
· 5/20/2004

In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of E.T.

Citations

  • 808 N.E.2d 639
  • 2004 Ind. LEXIS 463
  • 2004 WL 1121024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the improper admission of the reports of home visits and supervised visitations was harmless error
  • holding that the improper admission of the reports of home visits and supervised visitations was harmless error
  • holding that reports of home visits and supervised visitations made for the Office of Family and Children did not qualify as business records because no organization depended on them to operate
  • finding that reports of home visits and supervised visitations made for an Office of Family and Children did not qualify as business records because no organization depended on them to operate a business
  • holding improper admission of evidence harmless error where substantial independent evidence supported judgment
  • noting that “improper admission of evidence is harmless error when the judgment is supported by substantial independent evidence to satisfy the reviewing court that there is no substantial likelihood that the questioned evidence contributed to the judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.