Galloway v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Since applicant has no recognized liberty interest, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment does not require that a hearing be held to consider his petition for shock probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beanblossom v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-07-26· cited 44×
• Manley v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-07-03· cited 14×
• Sanders v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-08-10· cited 10×
• Ames v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-11-26· cited 3×
• Mitchell v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-08-22· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wolff v. McDonnell
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
• Morrissey v. Brewer
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Meachum v. Fano
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
• Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex
  Supreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
• Vitek v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,747×
• Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 728×
• Lazzell v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1974-01-16· cited 2×