Skip to main content

Rodia v. Tesco Corp.

Citations

  • 11 Conn. App. 391
  • 527 A.2d 721
  • 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[w]e view this statement by the plaintiffs in their [appellate] brief as analogous to a judicial admission and therefore binding on the plaintiffs’’
  • statute in question there provided that “neither an employer nor ... the insurer of such employer, shall have any lien upon any judgment received in any product liability claim, or any right of subrogation if the claim against the third party is a product liability claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.