Densberger v. United Technologies Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 59(e) motions are proper when there is “an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).