California Court of Appeal· 3/26/2003
Friedman v. Merck & Co.
Citations
- 131 Cal. Rptr. 2d 885
- 107 Cal. App. 4th 454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing negligence claims as claims for negligent misrepresentation because the language in the complaint focused on defendants’ representations and plaintiffs’ reliance on them
- “... the lawyer’s obligation to the client, at least absent knowledge of any unusual susceptibility, is economic; the lawyer does not assume an obligation to protect the client’s emotional state”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Turner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ovando v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-01-18· cited 73×
- Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-02-19· cited 63×
- Bock v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-04-02· cited 53×
- Janice H. v. 696 North Robertson, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-07-14· cited 41×
- Johnson v. McPheeIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-04-08· cited 27×
- Carrera v. Maurice J. Sopp & SonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-09-03· cited 14×
- Mehr v. Féderation Internationale de Football Ass'nN.D. California· 2015-07-16· cited 11×
- Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal· 2009-11-10· cited 7×
- Smith v. Phoenix Seating Systems, LLCS.D. Illinois· 2012-09-10· cited 5×
- Mayall ex rel. H.C. v. USA Water Polo, Inc.C.D. California· 2016-03-30· cited 4×
- Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsS.D. California· 2013-10-16· cited 4×
- Alereza v. Chicago Title Co.California Court of Appeal· 2016-11-16· cited 3×
- Isakson v. WSI CORP.W.D. Washington· 2011-02-09· cited 2×
- Terra Insurance v. New York Life Investment Management LLCN.D. California· 2010-05-11· cited 1×
- Williams v. Integon National Insurance Corp.S.D. California· 2016-06-03· cited 1×
- Kouri v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATECalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-03-08
- Leining v. Foster Poultry FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-02-23
- Leining v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2021-03-15
- Colonial Van & Storage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-03-18
Cites
98 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-08-01· cited 1,989×
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-08-08· cited 1,329×
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-06-21· cited 1,026×
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 800×
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-06-25· cited 707×
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-04-03· cited 606×
- Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court· 1993-05-05· cited 598×
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 572×
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 508×
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-12-04· cited 504×
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 493×
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-04-21· cited 473×
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-04-27· cited 440×
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-08-25· cited 419×
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-16· cited 411×
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court· 1992-08-27· cited 384×
- Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-12-02· cited 375×
- Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-23· cited 283×
- Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 274×
Other cases named Friedman v. Merck & Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.