Skip to main content
· 3/26/2003

Friedman v. Merck & Co.

Citations

  • 131 Cal. Rptr. 2d 885
  • 107 Cal. App. 4th 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing negligence claims as claims for negligent misrepresentation because the language in the complaint focused on defendants’ representations and plaintiffs’ reliance on them
  • “... the lawyer’s obligation to the client, at least absent knowledge of any unusual susceptibility, is economic; the lawyer does not assume an obligation to protect the client’s emotional state”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.