Freeland v. Enodis Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a trustee can recover from any combination of the entities mentioned in § 550(a) subject to the limitation of a \single satisfaction\
• \[T]he trustee can recover from any combination of the entities mentioned [in § 550 ] subject to the limitation of a single satisfaction.\
• “[T]he trustee can recover from any combination of the entities mentioned [in § 550] subject to the limitation of a single satisfaction.”
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (citation omitted)
• “[T]he trustee can recover from any combination of the entities mentioned [in § 550] subject to the limitation of a single satisfaction.”
• “payment of the accrued interest constituted ‘dollar-for-dollar forgiveness of a contractual debt,’ which is ‘reasonably equivalent value.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).