· 3/24/2011
Stamat v. Neary
Citations
- 635 F.3d 974
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5999
- 54 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 122
- 2011 WL 1045839
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the debtors' amendments did not \negate a finding of intent or cure the initial failures\
- finding debtor's education and business experience factored into a showing of reckless disregard
- “[A] showing of reckless disregard for the truth is sufficient to prove fraudulent intent” under § 727(a)(4)
- reckless 6 disregard shown where debtors who failed to disclose business 7 interests were highly educated and had significant business 8 experience
- reckless disregard shown where debtors who failed to disclose business interests were highly educated and had significant business experience
- the debtors’ level of education and business experience may inform the court’s analysis of their intent when considering whether they acted in reckless disregard for the truth
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovner, Evans, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.