Skip to main content
· 3/24/2011

Stamat v. Neary

Citations

  • 635 F.3d 974
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5999
  • 54 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 122
  • 2011 WL 1045839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the debtors' amendments did not \negate a finding of intent or cure the initial failures\
  • finding debtor's education and business experience factored into a showing of reckless disregard
  • “[A] showing of reckless disregard for the truth is sufficient to prove fraudulent intent” under § 727(a)(4)
  • reckless 6 disregard shown where debtors who failed to disclose business 7 interests were highly educated and had significant business 8 experience
  • reckless disregard shown where debtors who failed to disclose business interests were highly educated and had significant business experience
  • the debtors’ level of education and business experience may inform the court’s analysis of their intent when considering whether they acted in reckless disregard for the truth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rovner, Evans, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.