Fifth Circuit· 7/29/2005

LeClerc v. Webb

Citations

419 F.3d 405
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15755
2005 WL 1798623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[Plaintiff], although a 22 Canadian citizen, is not a beneficiary of NAFTA,” and “has no private right of action thereunder”
“[T]here is no incongruity between what Congress permits of student and temporary worker nonimmigrants and what Section 3(B) prevents”
“Because the level of constitutional protection afforded nonimmigrant aliens is different from that possessed by permanent resident aliens, we hold that the Louisiana rule survives rational basis review.”
“Section 3(B) does not succumb to the Toll infirmity of proscribing by state law what Congress expressly permits by federal statute . . . [because] Section 3(b
injunctive relief not barred when judges act in enforcement capacity
individual citizen of Canada was not a “beneficiary of NAFTA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Smith, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named LeClerc v. Webb

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.