United States v. Hvass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that rules and regulations promulgated by a district court that have been lawfully authorized and have a clear legislative base qualify as “a law of the United States,” as that phrase is used in a perjury statute
• holding that rules and regulations promulgated by a district court that have been lawfully authorized and have a clear legislative base qualify as “a law of the United States,” as that phrase is used in a perjury statute
• holding that local rules have the force of law
• court reviews for abuse of discretion a district court’s decisions concerning 2 24-5357 its management of litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).