Frausto v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]ourts must always consider the ‘interests of justice’ exception in section 78-35a-107 when a petitioner raises meritorious claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Laney v. Fairview City
  Utah Supreme Court· 2002-08-09· cited 41×
• Adams v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 2005-09-23· cited 25×
• Johnson v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 2006-04-04· cited 8×
• Manning v. State
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2004-04-01· cited 7×
• Boudreaux v. State
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-10-28· cited 5×
• Swart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-03-25· cited 1×
• Pyne v. State
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2008-11-28

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Julian v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 1998-08-04· cited 33×
• Provo City Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation
  Utah Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 27×
• Kelbach v. McCotter
  Utah Supreme Court· 1994-04-12· cited 8×
• Wright v. Carver
  Utah Supreme Court· 1994-11-28· cited 4×