Skip to main content

Franks v. State

Citations

  • 599 S.E.2d 134
  • 278 Ga. 246
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2132
  • 2004 Ga. LEXIS 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the Supreme Court’s use of the ABA’s Guidelines and “the standard practice of the jurisdiction at the time” in measuring trial counsel’s mitigation investigation
  • applying the highly probable test to determine whether a jury instruction rendered erroneous by a new rule adopted while the case was in the appellate pipeline constituted reversible error
  • in evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, ‘‘‘we are not interested in grading lawyers’ performances; we are interested in whether the adversarial process at trial, in fact, worked adequately’”
  • after killing victim’s husband at store, defendant went to victim’s home, stole money from safe, repeatedly stabbed victim and attacked her children
  • counsel’s strategy of conceding commission of acts but not the requisite mental state was not unreasonable, given overwhelming evidence
  • counsel’s strategy of conceding commission of acts but not the requisite mental state was not unreasonable, given overwhelming evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.