Eleventh Circuit· 9/16/2020
David Scott Franks v. GDCP Warden
Citations
- 975 F.3d 1165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- to prevail on Strickland claim under AEDPA, petitioner must show that “no reasonable jurist could find that his counsel’s performance fell within the wide range of reasonable professional conduct”
- “[E]vidence of [the petitioner’s] drug use, difficult childhood[,] and learning disability, in addition to being weak mitigating evidence, may have eroded any residual doubt if trial counsel had focused on those issues.” (quotation omitted)
- “The question of whether an attorney’s actions were actually the product of a tactical or strategic decision is an issue of fact, and a state court’s decision concerning that issue is presumptively correct.” (quoting , 148 F.3d 1327, 1330 (11th Cir. 1998))
- “The question of whether an attorney’s actions were actually the product of a tactical or strategic decision is an issue of fact, and a state court’s decision concerning that issue is presumptively correct.” (quoting , 148 F.3d 1327, 1330 (11th Cir. 1998))
- “The question of whether an attorney’s actions were actually the product of a tactical or strategic decision is an issue of fact, and a state court’s decision concerning that issue is presumptively correct.” (quoting , 148 F.3d 1327, 1330 (11th Cir. 1998))
- “The question of whether an attorney’s actions were actually the product of a tactical or strategic decision is an issue of fact, and a state court’s decision concerning that issue is presumptively correct.” (quoting , 148 F.3d 1327, 1330 (11th Cir. 1998))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 13,244×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court· 2009-03-24· cited 2,888×
- Wood v. AllenSupreme Court· 2010-01-20· cited 1,388×
- David Ronald Chandler v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2000-07-21· cited 1,022×
- Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 983×
- Porter v. McCollumSupreme Court· 2009-11-30· cited 915×
- Willie McNair v. Donal CampbellEleventh Circuit· 2005-07-13· cited 391×
- Brumfield v. CainSupreme Court· 2015-06-18· cited 391×
- Holladay v. HaleyEleventh Circuit· 2000-04-19· cited 371×
- William Howard Putman v. Frederick J. HeadEleventh Circuit· 2001-10-09· cited 280×
- Joseph R. Spaziano v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Thomas L. Barton, Superintendent, Florida State PrisonEleventh Circuit· 1994-10-07· cited 202×
- Provenzano v. SingletaryEleventh Circuit· 1998-08-06· cited 140×
- Michael Wade Nance v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic PrisonEleventh Circuit· 2019-04-30· cited 130×
- Owen v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2009-05-18· cited 97×
- Eric Lynn Ferrell v. Hilton HallEleventh Circuit· 2011-05-13· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.