Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 9/16/2020

David Scott Franks v. GDCP Warden

Citations

  • 975 F.3d 1165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to prevail on Strickland claim under AEDPA, petitioner must show that “no reasonable jurist could find that his counsel’s performance fell within the wide range of reasonable professional conduct”
  • “[E]vidence of [the petitioner’s] drug use, difficult childhood[,] and learning disability, in addition to being weak mitigating evidence, may have eroded any residual doubt if trial counsel had focused on those issues.” (quotation omitted)
  • “The question of whether an attorney’s actions were actually the product of a tactical or strategic decision is an issue of fact, and a state court’s decision concerning that issue is presumptively correct.” (quoting , 148 F.3d 1327, 1330 (11th Cir. 1998))
  • “The question of whether an attorney’s actions were actually the product of a tactical or strategic decision is an issue of fact, and a state court’s decision concerning that issue is presumptively correct.” (quoting , 148 F.3d 1327, 1330 (11th Cir. 1998))
  • “The question of whether an attorney’s actions were actually the product of a tactical or strategic decision is an issue of fact, and a state court’s decision concerning that issue is presumptively correct.” (quoting , 148 F.3d 1327, 1330 (11th Cir. 1998))
  • “The question of whether an attorney’s actions were actually the product of a tactical or strategic decision is an issue of fact, and a state court’s decision concerning that issue is presumptively correct.” (quoting , 148 F.3d 1327, 1330 (11th Cir. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.